Tuesday, June 15, 2010

IS MAGNETIC PRINCIPLE HELPS ON RING TRAVELLER SYSTEM???

have u ever came across a new concept instead of present ring & traveller system??? ( forget about orbit / SU rings - all are in same generation.)

THE LIMITATION OF PRESENT RING & TRAVELLER SYSTEM

  1. Due to continous contact in between rings & travellers , we are unable to increase the speed of ring frame above certain limit.
  2. Many tried to reach 25000 rpm , but very less chance of success noticed due to more end breaks , higher worn-out of ring travellers , improper quality of the yarns etc., etc.,
  3. the most important limitation is - FRICTION between RINGS & TRAVELLERS.
How to avoid the friction between ring & traveller.

  • as of now , we can't avoid the friction , but we may try to reduce the friction , by using a better coating for both ring & travellers. or different profile of rings & travellers.
Why not we can have a better design - where there is no contact area in between rings & travellers ? If we able to achieve , no need of changing ring flange , no need of changing ring travellers , no limitation of speed , no much damage to the fibre strand , better yarn quality , better efficiency by avoiding traveller chnage & ring change...so many advantagous.........

Is it possible to do the same???//

If u ask me right now , the chance is REMOTE. But quite sometime before , i came across some article - the ring traveler system designed by using a magnetic principle....

We all know - Magnets has a character that opposite sides attract each other & the same sides distract each other.

on this case , If we have two magnets - One is Ring - X SIDE of a magnet & other is Ring travellers - Same X Side of a magnet ...............so it distract each other.............

Yarn is on the travellers and traveller is drived because of yarn pull ( as usual like now...)......

On this case , ring should be a electro magnet and traveller should be a permanent magnet.....

I hope this can be a possible if we have through practical research...............

Time will Say the Answer..! Isn't it?

No comments: